The eternal debate between quality and commercial
success occurs in all aspects of life, including cinema and painting. As an
example, here’s a curious comparison between the prolific Spanish film director
Mariano Ozores and the renowned painter Pablo Picasso…
Any reader of this column familiar with Mariano
Ozores’ filmography (everyone knows Picasso) will clutch their head, dismissing
this headline as utter nonsense.
“How can you compare Picasso, a genius of painting, with a filmmaker who churns out movies like they’re churros? And never has the expression been more fitting because Mariano Ozores was the only Spanish director capable of making up to six films in a single year.” This quoted phrase, dear reader, could have been said by anyone, even you.
And I must admit that at first, I would have agreed
with that statement. I’ve seen many of this director’s films myself, and while
they’re often funny, we must acknowledge their poor quality.
Well, that was until the other day when I saw a 1963
film on television (released in December 1964) titled The Uncertain Hour,
written and directed by Mariano Ozores. But in the channel’s schedule, it
wasn’t categorized as a “comedy” but as a “suspense” film. “That must be a
mistake,” I thought, and I immediately set out to clear my doubts. I watched
the film and was astonished. It was, indeed, a suspense film, filled with a
wide variety of perfectly portrayed characters, and with stories—revolving
around the central plot—that skillfully intertwined.
In short, it wasn’t a masterpiece, but it was a good
film that shattered the image we all have of Mariano Ozores: the director of
mass-produced Spanish comedies.
I then wondered: if Mariano Ozores knew how to make
good films, why did he choose to make poor-quality ones? I recalled Picasso and
my visit to his museum in Málaga, where his paintings are displayed in
chronological order. When I saw his early works, I discovered a magnificent
painter… who, at that time, was a nobody… until the invention of Cubism
radically changed his career, making him famous and wealthy by painting those
strange things we all know.
Something similar must have happened to Mariano Ozores
because The Uncertain Hour was his fifth film, and his production company, “La
Hispánica,” went bankrupt after its resounding commercial failure. Perhaps
that’s why this director decided to change course and created a type of
cinema—fun but of poor quality—that earned the derogatory labels of
“españolada” and “landismo” (due to the frequent appearances of Alfredo Landa
in his films). And when censorship relaxed, he added the allure of the
“destape” (a period of Spanish cinema featuring more nudity). Indeed, many of
these films became major commercial successes, and Mariano Ozores kept making
movies non-stop (92 films between 1959 and 1993), filming four each year and
even six in one year.
For Mariano Ozores, quality cinema led to ruin, while
bad cinema made him a successful director. For Picasso, good painting brought
neither fame nor money, but Cubism turned him into a global painting icon.
That’s why I prefer the Mariano Ozores of The
Uncertain Hour and the Picasso of his early years, because neither Cubism nor
the “españoladas” inspire the slightest admiration in me—just smiles and a few
laughs.
P.S. – Now, all you “intellectuals” out there can go
ahead and tear your hair out.
“How can you compare Picasso, a genius of painting, with a filmmaker who churns out movies like they’re churros? And never has the expression been more fitting because Mariano Ozores was the only Spanish director capable of making up to six films in a single year.” This quoted phrase, dear reader, could have been said by anyone, even you.
This legendary television series from the eighties hid a secret message that has now been revealed: “The hidden message of Falcon Crest”: https://a.co/d/j1tn69R
No comments:
Post a Comment