Innovation for acne-prone skin

Spanish pharmaceutical company Reig Jofre has unveiled the launch of Vincobiosis Acneic, an innovative range of topical products that blends science and nature to care for acne-prone skin.

This new line, designed and developed by Reig Jofre’s innovation team, is centered around Canonia Allysis, a unique plant-derived biotechnological ingredient. Obtained through an advanced process leveraging Vytrus Biotech technology, it harnesses the natural defense mechanisms certain plants use to combat bacterial infections and external threats.
 
Clinical studies have shown that Vincobiosis Acneic effectively reduces blemishes on acne-prone skin in a natural and gentle way, preserving the skin’s ecosystem without disrupting beneficial microorganisms.
 
Initially, this groundbreaking product will be introduced in Spain through medical representative channels and pharmacies. Throughout 2025, it will expand to other international markets via Reig Jofre’s subsidiaries and licensing agreements with partner laboratories.
 

A journey through the history of the pharmaceutical industry and one of its great laboratories that had its origins in Alfred Nobel...
“From Alfred Nobel to AstraZeneca” (Vicente Fisac, Amazon) is available in e-Book and print editions: https://a.co/d/9svRTuI

The “Yes, Boss” syndrome

In the intricate web of workplace relationships, a phenomenon exists that can undermine an organization’s effectiveness and morale: the tendency of some executives to surround themselves exclusively with employees who offer a constant stream of praise and unconditional approval. This behavior not only disrupts internal dynamics but can also lead to flawed strategic decisions and a distorted corporate culture.

The Echo of Flattery: When Executives Favor Approval Over Merit
 
Executives caught in this cycle of flattery often develop what could informally be called the “Yes, Boss Syndrome.” It is characterized by: 
 
Circle of Sycophants: These leaders surround themselves with a group of employees who consistently agree with their decisions, bolstering an inflated sense of their own infallibility. This entourage acts like a court, where loyalty is proven through flattery rather than hard work or innovation. 
 
Belief in Praise: Over time, these executives start to buy into their own hype, mistaking flattery for genuine merit. This can distort their self-perception, leading to overconfidence in their leadership and decision-making abilities. 
 
Dismissal of True Talent: Employees with real skill, constructive criticism, or innovative ideas may be sidelined or ignored because they don’t fit the pattern of adulation the executive has come to expect. 
 
Favoritism and Bias: Promotions and recognition hinge more on personal approval than on professional achievements or capabilities, fostering a workplace where meritocracy gives way to informal nepotism.
 
Consequences for the Company
 
The impact of this behavior on the organization can be profound: 
 
Ineffective Decisions: Choices made without real dissent or critique may not be optimal, leading to strategic missteps that could have been avoided. 
 
Staff Demoralization: Employees who see sycophants rewarded over the deserving can become disengaged, lowering morale, commitment, and productivity. 
 
Talent Drain: Competent, forward-thinking professionals may seek opportunities elsewhere, at companies where their contributions are genuinely valued. 
 
Stagnant Innovation: A lack of diverse perspectives and the suppression of contrary opinions can halt the flow of innovation, which is critical in a competitive market.
 
Addressing the Phenomenon
 
To counter this dynamic, the following approaches are recommended: 
 
Authentic Leadership: Cultivate a leadership culture where executives actively seek constructive criticism and value diverse viewpoints. A leader must distinguish between empty praise and meaningful feedback. 
 
Transparent Performance Reviews: Implement objective evaluation systems based on clear performance metrics. This reduces bias and ensures recognition is tied to tangible achievements. 
 
Leadership Skill Development: Offer training that highlights the importance of nurturing genuine talent and innovation, teaching leaders to see disagreement as a catalyst for growth. 
 
Feedback-Friendly Culture: Foster an environment where all employees feel safe to voice their opinions without fear of reprisal, with executives modeling openness and receptivity.
 
Conclusion
 
While flattery might offer some executives short-term gratification and a false sense of security, the long-term health of any organization depends on leaders surrounding themselves with constructive critics and visionaries, not just yes-men. Only then can decisions be made in the company’s best interest, rather than to stroke the leader’s ego. 
 

A journey through the history of the pharmaceutical industry and one of its great laboratories that had its origins in Alfred Nobel...
“From Alfred Nobel to AstraZeneca” (Vicente Fisac, Amazon) is available in e-Book and print editions: https://a.co/d/9svRTuI

The “Excessive Delegator”

In the workplace, delegation is a vital skill for efficiently managing tasks and resources. However, there exists a particular type of employee who has turned delegation into a dark art of responsibility avoidance: those who systematically offload as much as possible, not to empower their team or optimize workflows, but to dodge hard work—only to later position themselves as masters of credit-taking and blame-shifting.

The Excessive Delegator’s Modus Operandi
 
Indiscriminate Delegation: They assign tasks, projects, and even minor decisions to others, often without regard for whether the recipient has the capacity or time to handle them effectively. 
 
Disengagement: Once a task is delegated, they wash their hands of it, providing little to no guidance or oversight, which can lead to subpar outcomes. 
 
Credit Hogging: When the delegated work yields success, they swiftly claim the credit, framing it as evidence of their leadership or management prowess. 
 
Blame Shifting: Conversely, when things go awry, they excel at deflecting responsibility, pointing fingers at the person who carried out the task for failing to understand, communicate, or meet expectations.
 
Negative Impacts on the Company
 
This excessive delegation carries several detrimental effects: 
 
Team Demotivation: Employees burdened with tasks dumped on them without proper support can feel overwhelmed, undervalued, or exploited, leading to low morale and reduced productivity. 
 
Work Quality: Lack of oversight and direction often results in lower-quality output, as delegated employees may lack the guidance needed to meet expectations. 
 
Culture of Irresponsibility: Encouraging a dynamic where accountability isn’t shared or acknowledged can erode teamwork and trust within the organization. 
 
Inefficiency: Delegation without a clear plan can lead to duplicated efforts, misunderstandings, and inefficient use of human resources.
 
Strategies to Address This Behavior
 
Organizations can take proactive steps to curb these effects and promote healthy delegation: 
 
Leadership and Management Training: Offer programs that highlight the importance of effective delegation, emphasizing ongoing supervision, support, and communication. 
 
Role and Responsibility Clarity: Ensure that delegators retain accountability for the tasks they assign, preventing total disengagement. 
 
Performance Evaluations: Introduce assessments that evaluate not just outcomes but also the delegation process itself, including how it was managed. 
 
Transparency Culture: Foster an environment that values team contributions and discourages blame-shifting. 
 
Positive Leadership Models: Leaders should exemplify delegation as a tool for team growth, not a means to avoid work.
 
Conclusion
 
Delegation is a powerful tool when used properly to drive growth, efficiency, and skill development within an organization. However, when it morphs into a tactic for evading responsibility, it can harm both morale and operational effectiveness. The solution lies in educating employees on proper delegation, fostering a culture of shared accountability, and ensuring that recognition and critique are fairly distributed. Only then can delegation be prevented from devolving into a game of avoidance and a race to claim unearned credit.
 

A journey through the history of the pharmaceutical industry and one of its great laboratories that had its origins in Alfred Nobel...
“From Alfred Nobel to AstraZeneca” (Vicente Fisac, Amazon) is available in e-Book and print editions: https://a.co/d/9svRTuI

Feeling uncomfortable with Contact Lenses is the main reason for rejection

Comfort is one of the key factors in the experience of contact lens users, according to the results of a survey conducted by Alcon to better understand the needs of lens wearers. The study is based on responses from 2,006 professionals and patients across four countries, including 501 participants from Spain. 

One of the survey’s key findings is that 81% of contact lens users who stop wearing them do so due to discomfort. In fact, comfort ranks just below visual correction as one of the most important factors that lenses must offer, according to respondents. Additionally, more than half of vision care professionals consider discomfort to be one of the primary barriers users face when wearing lenses. These insights may explain why 41% of users view experiencing some level of discomfort with contact lenses as “normal.” Itching, dryness, and end-of-day discomfort are among the most frequently reported issues. 
 
However, these problems can often be addressed by selecting the right lenses for each individual, which requires seamless communication between the optician and the patient.
 
As Prof. José M. González Méjiome explains, “Switching contact lenses for dissatisfied users depends on the professional. That’s why it’s crucial to dedicate time to improving lens fitting and prescribing the appropriate maintenance system when needed, identifying the best option for each person.” 
 
Despite this, the survey revealed that only 35% of contact lens users discuss these issues with their optician. “When a patient experiences discomfort or other problems related to their lenses, it’s essential that they feel confident enough to talk to their vision care professional, who can then seek the best alternative to ensure their satisfaction,” Prof. González Méjiome notes. In this regard, there is significant room for improvement in communication, as 55% of users lack the confidence to discuss lens comfort with their optician. 
 

A journey through the history of the pharmaceutical industry and one of its great laboratories that had its origins in Alfred Nobel...
“From Alfred Nobel to AstraZeneca” (Vicente Fisac, Amazon) is available in e-Book and print editions: https://a.co/d/9svRTuI 

The “Corporate Brown-Noser”

In the corporate world, where hierarchies and power dynamics are ever-present, a peculiar social phenomenon thrives: employees and executives who specialize in "brown-nosing" their superiors. While this behavior is hardly new, it has intensified in modern organizations where personal visibility and recognition can sometimes outweigh actual performance in value.

"Brown-nosing" refers to a set of actions and attitudes adopted by an employee or executive with the primary goal of pleasing and winning favor with their boss, often at the expense of productivity and workplace effectiveness. These behaviors may include: 
 
Excessive Flattery: Lavishing praise on the boss’s decisions, even when they’re far from sound. 
 
Relentless Visibility-Seeking: Ensuring the boss notices their presence and dedication, often by over-attending meetings or events where the boss will be. 
 
Playing the Messenger: Rushing to deliver news—especially good news—directly to the boss to score favor points. 
 
Unconditional Alignment: Adopting the boss’s opinions, even when common sense or professional ethics suggest otherwise. 
 
Risk Avoidance: Refusing to make decisions without explicit approval from the boss, sidestepping any chance of failure that might reflect poorly.
 
Impact on the Company
 
This behavior can have significant repercussions for both the individual and the organization: 
 
Uneven Work Distribution: Brown-nosers often spend time on activities that add little real value, leading to reduced productivity and overburdening colleagues who focus on their actual responsibilities. 
 
Popularity Over Merit: Promotions or key project assignments may hinge more on who’s the boss’s favorite than who’s truly capable, demoralizing talented employees. 
 
Toxic Workplace Culture: Perceptions of favoritism can breed distrust, unfair competition, and disengagement among staff. 
 
Stifled Innovation: Suppressing dissent or differing opinions to stay in the boss’s good graces can choke creativity and hinder progress within the company.
 
From a psychological standpoint, this phenomenon might stem from insecurity, a need for validation, or a calculated strategy for career advancement. Yet, from the perspective of effective leadership, a boss should distinguish between flattery and genuine merit: 
 
Authentic Leadership: Leaders must cultivate an environment that prizes hard work and innovation over sycophancy. This requires self-awareness of biases and openness to constructive criticism. 
 
Merit-Based Culture: Implementing objective evaluation systems that reward real performance and contributions to company goals can diminish the effectiveness of brown-nosing as a career tactic. 
 
Education and Awareness: Raising awareness among employees and executives about the downsides of these practices can foster a collaborative, respectful workplace.
 
Conclusion
 
While brown-nosing may seem like a winning short-term tactic for some, in the long run, both individuals and organizations thrive in environments where excellence, integrity, and innovation drive success. The key lies in recognizing and rewarding authentic performance, building a culture where every employee—regardless of their place in the hierarchy—can contribute value genuinely. The “art of pleasing the boss” is a fleeting skill that doesn’t stand the test of time.
 

A journey through the history of the pharmaceutical industry and one of its great laboratories that had its origins in Alfred Nobel...
“From Alfred Nobel to AstraZeneca” (Vicente Fisac, Amazon) is available in e-Book and print editions: https://a.co/d/9svRTuI